Hi, we are currently looking at employing video conferencing to teach "real time" to some of our dissaffected students. We have looked at webex, i-link and wiz IQ. Has anyone been through the process of choosing a web conferecing product to teach with? is anyone using a product they find particularly suitable?
thanks
I worked with an LEA that used I-link and it worked well. BUT - it was soon decided not to try and use the video facility - some reasons:
Additional technical problems even if video is one way, huge problems if students have cameras too.
Student privacy - the whole panic thing about missuse
There's very little added value with video - it's still not good enough that facial expession adds to communication - all you really end up with is a jerky teacher's head (the head is jerky, not the teacher)
HTH
Marshal
thanks - it seems that is the general concensus.
Dee
It depends very much on both the technology used and also how the activity is managed!
I had absolutely no problems of 'shaking heads' - the Video quality was perfect.
Also, how the equipment is used, - teacher supervised is necessary if it is not to be more than a plaything.
See my paper, almost 10 years old, now! [www.maximise-ict.co.uk/VC-at-FCC.pdf|http://www.maximise-ict.co.uk/VC-at-FCC.pdf]
As with so much of this stuff, it's really down to context. My situation was using cheap web-cams across a rather slow broadband connection, some of the kids were still on dial-up. If there's say 8 in a group, networking that amount of video/audio data is extremely problematic. On top of that, we were working with a group of very reluctant learners who used technical problems as one additional strategy to undermine a lesson.
I have used 'proper' VC and it's very kewel when it works, but using current affordable technology I still think it's more trouble than it's worth. But, of course, that depends on to context - if you are trying to connect hearing impared users live, then signing via video could be transforming.
Marshal
Hi, Marshal,
I totally agree with you. You remind me, I am also a qualified Teacher of the Deaf and used CCTV to help both Deaf and Partially Hearing children (in the old days of B/W TV) but then I went on to develop Subtitling for the Deaf.
Yes, we never know where a technology might lead! How many of the technologies of Dan Dare (in the Eagle comic) have now come true! Perhaps we should be watching more children's television to see what comes next?
I've just come off a 1.5 hr WebEx conversation with colleagues in America - I wonder if Video-Chat will catch on?
